National Security Strategy Comparison

Mid-Term Essay †Compare/Contrast European Security Strategy (ESS) with US National Security Strategy (NSS) By James E. McDonald Regional/Cultural Studies Lesson 03 24 Mar 2013 Instructor: Col (ret) Frank Belote Air Command and Staff College Distance Learning Maxwell AFB, AL The Security Strategy of the United States has stamped similitudes and contrasts to the Security Strategy of Europe. This can be successfully followed to the similitudes and contrasts between the two societies themselves, especially in the social variables of religion, modernization, ethnicity/patriotism, and geography.The US and Europe have various reactions to the modernization of fighting from conventional (ships, armed forces, tanks, airplane) to â€Å"asymmetrical† (fear mongering, digital fighting), to a great extent from contrasts in geology: With the prominent special cases of Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Center, our foe danger has been a huge number of miles away, while Europe has seen two grisly â€Å"world wars† and demonstrations of dread submitted directly on home soil.However, for the motivations behind this paper, I will concentrate on religion and ethnicity/patriotism, and how these two elements influence key culture. Culture is significant. It characterizes what’s critical to a gathering, or country. It rises in expressed tenet, laws, methodology. It characterizes what our identity is. There are normal perspectives, interests, needs, and verbiage in both Security Strategic records. Significant forces find a sense of contentment. The world economy has developed; globalism is progressively significant. We should lessen reliance on remote energy.We have a promise to coalition with one another (US and Europe) by means of NATO (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). NATO has made a solid tie between the US and Europe since it was made to contain the Soviets, incorporating Europe and the United States strategically and militarily (Friedman, 2011, 1). Truth be told, â€Å"For any sort of military arranging and activities as to Russia, the Europeans will like to act through NATO instead of the EU. † (Valesek, 2008, 1)In differentiation to the above shared characteristics, the United States archive, while recognizing that â€Å"no one nationâ€no matter how powerfulâ€can address worldwide difficulties alone†, more than once shows looks at â€Å"Nationalist† suggestions with articulations, for example, â€Å"Our nation has the qualities that have upheld our authority for decadesâ€sturdy unions, an unrivaled military, the world’s biggest economy, a solid and developing majority rule government, and a unique populace. † (Obama, 2010, 1-9). The European report, then again, straightforwardly and over and over calls for â€Å"Unification† and â€Å"Cooperation† (European Security Strategy, 2003, 1-8).The United States can draw from European strict history and e thnic cause, which gives it some social likenesses. Simultaneously, the introduction of our country was a great deal more later, thus significantly not the same as the start of European history, that it’s no big surprise there are central contrasts in culture. Indeed, even before the Declaration of Independence (â€Å"God† and â€Å"truth† referenced) or the US Constitution were drafted (â€Å"freedom of religion†), early America was established in Christianity. The main Pilgrims fled strict mistreatment in Europe.Christian tenet has been cited in discourses given by American pioneers from the earliest starting point (Governor John Walthrop, Massachusetts Governor, 1630), to later/present-day Presidents (Reagan, GW Bush, Obama), The United States has been alluded to as something â€Å"different†, a brilliant illustration all the world to see and copy, a â€Å"city on a hill†. (Walthrop, 1630, 1). America, from its beginnings to today, while inviting decent variety, keeps on being a predominately Christian culture, taking into account strict hints in national archives (for the most part noticeable through reference to â€Å"values†, and â€Å"truth†).Europe then again, in its test to bring together the 27 nations that structure the European Union (Rosenberg, 2011, 1), must proceed with caution so as not to distance or outrage any bit of the contemporary mix of Christian, Muslim, and â€Å"Secular† societies (Rubenstein, 2011, 1). Both the US and Europe are ethnically and racially assorted. Many wonder about the capacity to hold bearing and center despite such decent variety. Early America shaped workers into a â€Å"melting pot†, blending verifiable roots into a soup that turned out to be unmistakably â€Å"American†.Nowadays, the inclination is to clutch ethnic contrasts and portray the outcome as a â€Å"mosaic† or â€Å"salad bowl† †separate pieces that, when seen in general, make a bigger picture (Branigin, 1998). Disregarding this ongoing movement to hold ethnic independence, America appears to effectively arrange this into its frontiersman â€Å"rugged individualist† mindset, yet in evading division along racial lines, figures out how to effectively grasp all gatherings into a feeling of solitary â€Å"nationalism†.Europe then again, battles to adjust 27 countries, each with their own feeling of patriotism, without giving noteworthy inclination to any one culture. A definitive effect of these strict and ethnic/nationalistic contrasts is that, indeed, the US National Security Strategy peruses uniquely in contrast to the European Security Strategy. The difference in foundation brings about various wording and position, various explanations behind why we do what we do, and the ideal outcome. This can cause misjudging, and even doubt between these two extraordinary entities.However, it’s essential to reason that by and la rge, we BOTH have a similar extreme aim: a proceeded with promise to trans-atlantic relationship, globalized economy, diminished reliance on outside vitality, and, above all, harmony and security to our reality (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). Taking everything into account, numerous world scientists (counting Samuel P Huntington in his guide of â€Å"The World of Civilizations†), while recognizing social classifications on the planet, bunch the US, Canada, Greenland, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand as â€Å"the West† (Huntington, 1997, 26).Due to the accentuation on solid strict roots, faith in right, show fate, and ethnic assorted variety in the United States, our expressed goals and self-distinguished job on the planet is special. In any case, by and large, European †US procedure and culture are not all that amazingly unique. List of sources Branigin, William, â€Å"The Myth of the Melting Pot: America’s Racial and Ethnic Divides. Migrants Shunning Idea of Assimilation† (Washington, DC: Washington Post, 25 May 1998), http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/national/longterm/meltingpot/melt0525a. htmEuropean Security Strategy, A Secure Europe in a Better World, (Brussels, 12 December 2003), 2-14 Friedman, George, â€Å"The Crisis of Europe and European Nationalism† (Austin, TX: StratFor Global Intelligence, 13 September 2011), 1, http://www. stratfor. com/week by week/20110912-emergency europe-and-european-patriotism Huntington, Samuel P. , â€Å"The World of Civilizations† The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, NY: Touchstone, 1997), 26-27 Obama, Barack, National Security Strategy (Washington, DC: Whitehouse Archives, 2010), 1-9Rosenberg, Matt, â€Å"European Union Countries† (About. com, 09 December 2011), 1, http://geology. about. com/od/records/an/eumembers. htm Rubenstein, Richard L. , â€Å"Islam and Christianity: The Roots of Euro pe’s Religious Identity† (New English Review, December 2011), 1, http://www. newenglishreview. organization/custpage. cfm/frm/102790/sec_id/102790 Valesek, Tomas, â€Å"Europe’s Defense and its New Security Strategy† (Center for European Reform Bulletin: London, England, Dec 2007-Jan 2008), 1, http://gees. organization/documentos/Documen-02705. pdf Walthrop, John, â€Å"Modell of Christian Charity† (Massachusetts, 1630), 1,